Resources for Attorneys

Attorneys often seek expert consultation when psychological issues arise in litigation. The following information may assist attorneys in determining whether a forensic psychological evaluation may be helpful in a case.

A forensic psychological evaluation may be appropriate when:

  • A plaintiff claims psychological injury or emotional distress
  •  The case involves PTSD or trauma-related conditions
  • Questions arise regarding causation of psychological symptoms
  • There are concerns about symptom exaggeration or malingering
  • Psychological issues may affect credibility or functioning
  • Mental health factors are relevant to parenting ability or family dynamics

Early consultation with a forensic expert can help clarify what psychological questions may be relevant in the case.

Attorneys typically provide documentation that may include:

  • Medical and mental health records
  • Employment records
  • Deposition transcripts
  • Prior psychological or psychiatric evaluations
  • Relevant legal filings or discovery materials

The reliability of forensic opinions is significantly affected by the scope and completeness of the underlying records.

Forensic psychological services may include:

  • Independent psychological evaluations
  • Consultation regarding psychological evidence in litigation
  • Review and critique of other expert reports
  • Preparation of written forensic reports
  • Deposition and courtroom testimony

Each case is evaluated to determine whether the referral question falls within the scope of professional expertise and available evidence.

Forensic psychological work is guided by professional standards designed to ensure scientific integrity and objectivity. These standards include:

  • APA Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology
  • Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct
  • Established psychological assessment practices
  • Applicable legal standards governing expert testimony

Adherence to these guidelines helps ensure that forensic opinions are methodologically sound and professionally responsible.

Questions? Contact Dr. McNaught >